Start with the object
The artifact, site, date, excavation record, museum record, and academic context matter before speculative explanations.
Ancient alien claim review
远古外星人 / ancient aliens
A source-backed ancient aliens hub covering ancient mysteries, artifacts, megaliths, manuscripts, archaeological explanations, and pseudoarchaeology debunks.
Start with the object
The artifact, site, date, excavation record, museum record, and academic context matter before speculative explanations.
Why pseudoarchaeology spreads
A real ancient achievement can be reframed as alien because the engineering is impressive, not because the alien claim has evidence.
Best comparison cases
Antikythera Mechanism, Gobekli Tepe, Stonehenge, Nazca Lines, Voynich Manuscript, and Baghdad Battery are better inspected as source-backed archaeological puzzles.
Latest reporting
18 reports / last 14 days
Reporting stays visible even when it has not cleared the threshold for a standalone case. Confidence describes source posture, not the truth of every claim in the headline.
Roswell was an actual UFO crash: Oliver Stone’s son talks aliens NewsNation
Alien Alert: UFO Days 2026 kicks off this week Pierce County Journal
Astronomers may have found an unexpected origin for the mysterious "little red dots" that appear to be so common in James Webb Space Telescope surveys of the early universe.
The Bay Area UFO files: Trump disclosures could fuel more reports of aliens UnionLeader.com
An ancient bronze chariot recently discovered in Spain was used by a culture that mysteriously disappeared from the archaeological record.
A decade after uncovering a mysterious mathematical relationship in the physics of "jamming," Nobel laureate Giorgio Parisi and collaborator Francesco Zamponi have finally cracked the case — not with a radical new theory, but with the help of the generative AI Claude.
Vance tells Rogan ‘I’m skeptical’ about UFOs and aliens in US custody The Hill
Unidentified flying objects have been reported by astronauts while in space. These sightings have been claimed as evidence for extraterrestrial life by ufologists. Some of the alleged sightings never occurred: science fiction writer Otto Binder perpetuated a hoax claiming Apollo 11 Commander Neil Armstrong had encounte
Twenty years ago, 62 pupils at Ariel School said they saw an alien spaceship. It
In 1994, 60 children at a Zimbabwe school said they'd seen a "UFO" - a BBC crew was first on the scene.
A series of slides uncovered in an Arizona home seemed to unlock the riddle that has baffled UFO enthusiasts for years. But was it all too good to be true?
The mystery behind a strangely dimming star could soon be solved.
voynich 51 captures 28 Sep 2007 - 11 Dec 2025 Dec JAN Feb 26 2008 2009 2010 success fail About this capture COLLECTED BY Organization: Alexa Crawls Starting in 1996, Alexa Internet has been donating their crawl data to the Internet Archive. Flowing in every day, these data are added to the Wayback Machine after an embargo period. Collection: alexa_web_2009 this data is currently not publicly accessible. TIMESTAMPS The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20090126223023/http://hurontaria.baf.cz:80/CVM/b12.htm BACK TO DISCUSSIONS B12. THE NEW SIGNATURE OF HORCZICKY AND THE COMPARISON OF THEM ALL. Jan B. Hurych, January 2007) ' Signature No.2.: Since our discovery of official signature of Horczicky IN 2003 (No.1., see our section B10), the second one was discovered in Prague. It was Ren' Zandbergen who discovered it as an exlibris in one of the books owned by Horczicky. It was once the property of Clementinum, see http://www.voynich.nu/extra/img/sinapius1602a.jpg It does not however contain the word "Tepenec" as does the one in the VM, as well as the other two signature. Instead, it quotes the old name "Sinapi" . ' Signature No.3.: Quite recently, in January 2007, Petr Kazil copied another signature in the book in National Library of Prague, on recommendation by Rafal Prinke (it was known in 2000, by Rafal, but it was somehow overlooked until 2007. The photographs by Peter are at http://www.xs4all.nl/~kazil/testfiles/vu/ Our comment: The reaction to our first discovery (year 2003) was slightly negative. It happened to be on some official document signed by Horczicky when he was the heytman of Melnik castle, 1617) and it was objected that it was too "ceremonial" to be used for analysis of Horczicky's name in the VM. When the second signature was found, it was considered as "similar" to the one in the VM, without any further analysis. Now, when the third , non-ceremonial signature was found, one can see clearly it is by the same hand as the first signature. So we are now vindicated and to further prove the similarity of those two "signatures", i.e the first and the third, while the second is quite different. The following comparisons are given. Also, the comparison with "signature" in the VM is made. THE COMPARISON OF SIGNATURES. (Jan Hurych) Both first and third signatures are in Czech, i.e .the words "Jakub z Tepence", in first case are in nominative (the official signature), and slightly modified, in the third, as "Jakuba z Tepence" ( in genitive , since it is the exlibris, ownership), First we show the first signature, slightly magnified: The third signature can be seen by clicking on the link above, here we only compare some letters in the sections. First the letter "k". The picture on the left is the third signature, at the right is the first one. The agreement in shape and form is very good. Then follows the section "Tep", notice the similarity of peculiar letter "p" in both cases. The word in between "Jacobi" and "Tepenec" is in both cases the Czech letter "z" written in the same old fashion, looking like number "3". The meaning of "z" in Czech language is the same as in Latin "de". Even here is certain similarity. For comparison, the third picture is the same symbol from the VM, also in between words "Jacobi" and "Tepenec". It was guessed once it was really "de" or a Greek letter "delta", the shorthand for Latin "de". None of this can be seen here and it seems it is the same "z" ( meaning the sign in the space before capital "T"). Of course, we cannot be sure yet, the symbol is hardly visible. Before we carry on, some words about the second, that is the "Sinapi" signature. There is no doubt that "Sinapi" is former Horczicky's name (before he received his title), latinized. The word "inscriptus" added may or may not confirm it was written by him personally. However, the comparison with two other signatures is very difficu
Who Whom? 23 captures 17 Jul 2011 - 04 Feb 2024 Sep OCT Nov 07 2010 2011 2012 success fail About this capture COLLECTED BY Organization: Internet Archive The Internet Archive discovers and captures web pages through many different web crawls. At any given time several distinct crawls are running, some for months, and some every day or longer. View the web archive through the Wayback Machine . Collection: Wikipedia Outlinks July 2011 Crawl of outlinks from wikipedia.org started July, 2011. These files are currently not publicly accessible. TIMESTAMPS The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20111007181002/http://www.voynichcentral.com/users/philipneal/seventeenthcentury/raphael_sentence.html To the main page Who whom? Rudolph II, Raphael Mnishovsky and the 600 ducats Discussion of the Voynich manuscript often returns to the well-known sentence in which Johannes Marcus Marci tells Athanasius Kircher what he knows about it. Retulit mihi D. Doctor Raphael Ferdinandi tertij Regis tum Boemiae in lingua boemica instructor dictum librum fuisse Rudolphi Imperatoris, pro quo ipse latori qui librum attulisset 600 ducatos praesentarit, authorem uero ipsum putabat esse Rogerium Bacconem Anglum. ego judicium meum hic suspendo. How should we interpret this complex sentence? Why not start with a shortened version in which we cut out people's titles, omit one clause which is certainly ambiguous, and modernise the punctuation. Retulit mihi ... Raphael ... 'librum fuisse Rudolphi'. 'Authorem' uero 'ipsum' putabat 'esse Rogerium'. Ego judicium meum hic suspendo. This is straightforward. Two verbs of speech introduce two pieces of reported speech in the accusative and infinitive construction. Verb: retulit (perfect indicative, 'he once told me') Direct speech: liber erat Rudolphi , 'the book was Rudolph's' Verb: putabat (imperfect indicative, 'it was his opinion') Direct speech: author ipse est Rogerius , 'the author is Roger' By the accusative and infinitive rule, erat (imperfect indicative) becomes fuisse (perfect infinitive) and est (present indicative) becomes esse (present infinitive). The final sentence is simple. So far Marci has told us three things. What Raphael once told him about Rudolph. What Raphael thought was the identity of the author. That Marci has no opinion of his own. But the first piece of reported speech continues: pro quo ipse latori qui librum attulisset 600 ducatos praesentarit Since this is a relative clause ( pro quo... ) inside reported speech the accusative and infinitive construction does not apply. Instead nominative and accusative remain as they were and the verbs become subjunctive. To reconstruct the direct speech we must convert the verbs back to indicative. The obvious way of doing so is this: pro quo ipse latori qui librum attulerat 600 ducatos praesentavit attulerat (pluperfect indicative) becomes attulisset (pluperfect subjunctive) praesentavit (perfect indicative) becomes praesentarit (perfect subjunctive, also written praesentaverit ) In that case Raphael, having said that Rudolph owned the book, continued 'and he personally gave 600 ducats to the person who brought the book'. This makes perfect sense. Rudolph loved books and had the funds to pay extravagantly for them. Unfortunately, here for the first time the Latin is ambiguous. It might also be that the direct speech form of praesentarit is praesentavi (first person not third person). Raphael may be saying that he, Raphael, presented the ducats. Can we resolve the ambiguity? The word ipse , which sometimes disambiguates the accusative and infinitive construction, is no help here. The key, it seems to me, is to consider why this piece of reported speech is a relative clause in the first place. The reason, clearly, is to attach it to the words that went before, not the words which come after. We have been told one thing about Rudolph, that he owned the book, and now we are being told another, that he paid for it in person. If, on the other hand,
New York Festivals - 2011 World's Best Television & FilmsTM Winners 45 captures 09 Mar 2012 - 17 Dec 2025 Feb MAR Apr 09 2011 2012 2013 success fail About this capture COLLECTED BY Organization: Internet Archive The Internet Archive discovers and captures web pages through many different web crawls. At any given time several distinct crawls are running, some for months, and some every day or longer. View the web archive through the Wayback Machine . Collection: Wide Crawl started January 2012 Web wide crawl with initial seedlist and crawler configuration from January 2012 using HQ software. TIMESTAMPS The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20120309095747/http://www.newyorkfestivals.com/winners/tvf2011winners/pieces.php?iid=413203&pid=1 2011 World's Best Television & FilmsTM Winners Piece #1 Browse by Winners :: Silver World Medal :: Science & Technology :: Austria Piece #1 - The Voynich Code - The World's Mysterious Manuscript Company: ORF Award: Silver World Medal Brand: ORF Title: The Voynich Code - The World's Mysterious Manuscript Country: Austria Competition: Television - Documentary/Information Program Category: Science & Technology Talent Credits Klaus T. Steindl, Andreas Sulzer - Writers and Directors Hubert Doppler AAC - Photographer Markus Poechinger - Music Composer Andreas Sulzer, Klaus T. Steindl - Producers Walter Koehler, Martin Meszaros - Executive Producers Pino Mella, Alois Sulzer - Additional Camera Michaela Muellner - Editor David Williamson - Narrator ORDER A PERSONALIZED AWARD FOR THIS ITEM (C) 2011 New York Festivals (R) International Awards Group (R) LLC
Tracking the Legend of Bigfoot | Arizona State Museum Skip to main content Search search search Search menu Menu home Home close Close Search search Main Menu About chevron_right Visit chevron_right OnView+OnLine+OnDemand Events Shop Education Collections chevron_right Research chevron_right Join chevron_right Donate | | | Cultural Resources Management Services Main navigation About Submenu for About About Arizona State Museum Contact Us Personnel What We Do Mission, Vision, and Values ASM By The Numbers Employment Opportunities Visit Submenu for Visit Plan Your Visit Library and Archives Photography and Videography Policy Accessibility and Service Animals Explore the Campus and Beyond OnView+OnLine+OnDemand Events Shop Education Collections Submenu for Collections Overview Archaeology Ethnohistory Ethnology Library and Archives Photography Zooarchaeology Ancient Old World Collections Access to the Collections for Research Purposes Information For Those Seeking Appraisals and Object Identification Research Submenu for Research Overview ASM Archaeological Series Bioarchaeology Lab Conservation Laboratory Homol'ovi Research Program Legacies of Spanish Water Law Office of Ethnohistorical Research Point of Pines Collections Research Lab Pueblo Glaze-painted Ware Repatriation Office Zooarchaeology Laboratory Online Research Resources Join Submenu for Join Membership Friends of the ASM Collections Director Circles Donate Home Online Exhibit Return To Curator's Choice Main Menu Tracking The Legend of Bigfoot Tracking the Legend of Bigfoot Image Cast of Alleged Bigfoot Footprint Footprint found by Roger Patterson, Bluff Creek, northern California, 1967 Length: 18.0 in. (45.7 cm.), Width: 9.2 in. (23.3 cm.), Plaster cast made by John W. Olsen in 1979 at Arizona State Museum from a cast that was obtained from Grover Krantz (ASM Catalog No. 2011-470-1a) Image Text by Dr. John A. McClelland, retired Osteology Lab Manager and NAGPRA Coordinator, October 2011 Legends of wild humanoid creatures are as old as human history and span the globe. Names and other details vary, but common traits of these undocumented animals are bipedalism, gigantic size, hair-covered bodies, and a potential to cause harm. A Native American tradition in the Pacific Northwest tells of a giant hair-covered ogre named Tsonoqua who steals children and food. This is likely the origin of the Sasquatch or Bigfoot legend. Bigfoot was popularized in 1958, when news media picked up a story about Ray Wallace, a road contractor working in northern California, who made plaster casts of giant footprints that he found near his worksite. Hundreds of similar footprints and a few handprints have now been reported; some were clearly made by bears, some are fraudulent (one of Ray Wallace’s relatives later found carved wooden feet matching some of the footprint casts), and many others remain unexplained. This footprint cast is associated with the most celebrated Bigfoot sighting of modern times. In October 1967 Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin ventured into the woods in search of Bigfoot near where Wallace found his Bigfoot tracks. In Bluff Creek, they sighted a creature strolling through a clearing and they managed to film a short sequence from a reported distance of about 80 feet. The resulting movie is grainy and difficult to interpret, but clearly shows something unlike any animal known to inhabit the region. To some this is incontestable proof that Bigfoot lives among us, but to others it is merely a man or a woman in a gorilla suit. This handprint cast is a copy of the original made by Ivan Marx. Grover Krantz, a physical anthropologist who studied the anatomy of Bigfoot hand and foot impressions, found many details in this impression that he thought were too difficult to fake. Others were not convinced; the original museum catalogue card for this item has the note: “This ‘handprint’ is almost certainly NOT genuine!” Despite many eyewitness accounts
Times Publications | The Readers are Here 24 captures 06 Jan 2009 - 30 Dec 2025 Dec JAN Feb 06 2008 2009 2010 success fail About this capture COLLECTED BY Collection: Common Crawl Web crawl data from Common Crawl. TIMESTAMPS The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20090106024149/http://timespublications.com/nov06-feature1.asp Serving Scottsdale Northeast Phoenix Glendale Chandler Gilbert East Mesa This Month's Cover SITE FEATURES This month's top stories from the Valley's most popular newspaper - The Zany Press Renowned restaurant critics' suggested Valley eats. A closer look into the private workspaces of some of the Valley's high-profile personalities. OPEN DOOR POLICY Award-Winning Feature Writing Read The Times most recent Arizona Press Club award-winning stories, the most revered awards in Arizona journalism. Walking Tall Guilty Frozen Assets The Vanity Tax Addicted Youth Silicone Valley Fatal Lapse Shooting Stars Finding Love Again Auction Action Unidentified - John Dickerson Nearly ten years after the most widespread, documented UFO sighting in history, Valley astronomers and eyewitnesses are still speculating on just what flew over Phoenix that night. When Robert Brewer first saw brake lights and traffic stopped on the 51, the Scottsdale pastor and PhD assumed there had been an accident. 'They're all looking up. What's going on?' Brewer's friend asked as he pulled his car to the side of the road. To this day, Brewer doesn't believe in aliens or space ships, but he does know the silent, hovering lights he watched for about 20 minutes on March 13, 1997, were unlike anything he'd seen before or since. 'It was like the first time you walk to the edge of the Grand Canyon. I was literally breathless,' Brewer says. Along the shoulder of the 51, bystanders watched silently. Some were on their knees. Others raised their arms. From Prescott to Tucson, hundreds of Arizona residents stood in awe of the massive lights. The witness reports read the same: a V of huge, unblinking, hovering lights parading in silent unison across the night sky. Almost 10 years after the sighting, Valley astronomers, pilots and psychiatrists are still searching for an explanation to what was arguably the most documented UFO sighting ever, now dubbed the Phoenix Lights. Among those still affected are former UFO skeptics. Explanations vary from military tests to extraterrestrial visitors, but the eyewitnesses do agree on one thing: 'You had to be there to really understand.' This was not like anything from Earth.' 'I'VE SEEN FLARES BEFORE. THESE WEREN'T FLARES.' On a recent cool October evening, media personality and astronomer 'Dr. Sky' Steve Kates is hosting a black-tie audience under a starlit Gilbert sky. Kates is a regular on TV and radio programs discussing the astronomically unexplained. Kates doesn't believe in aliens. In the nine years since the Phoenix Lights sightings, he has hosted hundreds of discussions about the phenomena. Tonight, between live phone interviews with world-renowned astronomers and former astronauts, Kates says experimental government aircraft are responsible for the Phoenix Lights. 'I think it's a very major event that took place and a matter of national security,' he says. 'Two separate events took place the night of March 13, 1997.' Kates believes a very large, silent surveillance blimp flew over Arizona while diversionary flares hoped to distract any Hale-Bopp comet watchers from noticing, adding that one need only interview so many sane, educated eyewitnesses to conclude the Phoenix Lights were more than just flares. Among the sane, educated type described by Kates are Mark and Celia Chapman, neither of whom believe in little green men or messages from the stars. But when asked if they're familiar with the Phoenix Lights, the Honeywell engineer and healthcare consultant exuberantly recounts their 1997 sighting of the lights. 'We were sitting in the spa. There was nothing by the McDowell Mou
A 600-page guide may lend credibility to UFO believers. It can apparently be found in firehouses across the Valley.
Source-backed cases
Ranked by direct relevance first
National Archaeological MuseumThe Antikythera Mechanism is an ancient Greek geared device recovered from a shipwreck and studied as an unusually sophisticated astronomical calculator.
Gobekli Tepe is an early Neolithic monumental site in southeastern Turkey whose carved stone enclosures changed debates about ritual, settlement, and social organization.
UNESCO World Heritage CentreStonehenge is a prehistoric monument built in stages in southern Britain; archaeology explains much of its construction while its changing ritual purposes remain debated.
The Voynich Manuscript is an illustrated early fifteenth-century codex written in an undeciphered script, with competing linguistic, cryptographic, and hoax theories.
UNESCO World Heritage CentreThe Nazca Lines are large geoglyphs in Peru whose construction, purpose, and ritual context remain widely discussed.
JstorCeramic jars with copper and iron components found near Baghdad have been interpreted as possible ancient electrical cells, although their original purpose remains disputed.
Thousands of large stone jars across Laos form an Iron Age archaeological landscape associated with mortuary practices, while their exact use and cultural context remain studied.
Crystal skull is tracked by MysteryAtlas as a source-backed mystery case for evidence inspection, explanation review, and conservative assessment.
Thousands of ceramic figures found near Acambaro, Mexico were promoted as ancient artifacts, but archaeological context and dating evidence support a modern origin.
Developing reports
These reports match this special topic cluster, but they have not cleared the full publication gate. They are shown here only when there is media or enough source signal to inspect.
Npr source discovered from Wikipedia references.
This report is visible as a developing item because it has media or source material, but it has not cleared the full case threshold.
Stonehenge is tracked as a v2 source cluster with 1 independent source domains, 1 trusted sources, and 1 evidence items.
This report is visible as a developing item because it has media or source material, but it has not cleared the full case threshold.
Voynich manuscript is tracked as a v2 source cluster with 2 independent source domains, 2 trusted sources, and 1 evidence items.
This report is visible as a developing item because it has media or source material, but it has not cleared the full case threshold.
Göbekli Tepe is tracked as a v2 source cluster with 1 independent source domains, 1 trusted sources, and 1 evidence items.
This report is visible as a developing item because it has media or source material, but it has not cleared the full case threshold.
Ancient Apocalypse is tracked as a source cluster with 3 independent source domains and 2 extracted evidence items.
This report is visible as a developing item because it has media or source material, but it has not cleared the full case threshold.
Ley line is tracked as a source cluster with 1 independent source domains and 1 extracted evidence items.
This report is visible as a developing item because it has media or source material, but it has not cleared the full case threshold.
Death of Cleopatra is tracked as a source cluster with 2 independent source domains and 1 extracted evidence items.
This report is visible as a developing item because it has media or source material, but it has not cleared the full case threshold.
Baghdad Battery source reference is tracked as a source cluster with 2 independent source domains and 1 extracted evidence items.
This report is visible as a developing item because it has media or source material, but it has not cleared the full case threshold.
Search answers
MysteryAtlas does not treat that as established. Ancient alien claims need stronger evidence than complexity or surprise.
Many ancient mysteries are real as archaeological or historical puzzles, even when alien explanations are weak.
Pseudoarchaeology uses archaeological objects or sites to support claims that are not well supported by evidence or method.